|
|
Meeting Details: 3:30-4:30pm at the District Registration Center Conference Room Schools Represented: Bemis, Carter, Curtis, Eisenhower, Kucera, Myers, Trapp New Year: New committee members were welcomed and encouraged to familiarize themselves with the meeting minutes from last year (available on this blog) and the new District Educational Technology Plan available on the committee's website. One of the primary goals of the committee this year will be to continue reviewing gradebook programs and develop a recommendation for districtwide adoption. Gradebook Program Review - Easy Grade Pro: Brent Copeland, teacher at Kucera, demonstrated how he uses Easy Grade Pro for standards-based grading. The following provides a brief synopsis of the functionality. More details and a demo version can be downloaded from the company website. - Standards-based Grading: In addition to traditional point/percentage grading, EGP supports grading by standard. An assignment can be identified with one or more standards and the score for each of these standards can be entered. The resulting student report shows each standard, the assignments that addressed that standard, the score for each assignment, the overall score on the standard, and the overall score across all standards. Key standards can be weighted within the overall score for the class.
- Management: the student roster can be copied from one class to another; a student and his/her grades can be moved from one class to another (in the case of a student changing periods); teacher can hide/show dropped students; an assignment can be copied from one class to another
- Reports: a variety of reports are available with many options to customize each of them. The list includes a student progress report by standard, missing assignments, roster sheet, and more.
- Compatability: does have the ability to interface with student information system (eSchool) to auto-enroll students; can import from assessment software (DataDirector, student response systems); can export traditional grades (not standards-based grades) into eChalk.
- Additional Features: includes seating chart, attendance tracking, behavioral notes. Has an optional web-publishing subscription to provide parent access to
grades; also has a web-based version of the gradebook program (with yearly
subscription fee) that allows teachers to enter scores from any
computer.
Committee members suggested also reviewing GradeQuick and SnapGrades. Cyberbullying: All certificated staff will be expected to complete the online Cyberbullying course in the Keenan SafeSchools program. This course was selected by the committee last year to address the need to train staff in how to identify and address cyberbullying. The course takes 25 minutes to complete and can be done through any Internet-connected computer. Committee members recommended principals set aside time during a staff meeting to allow their staff to complete the course; a completion date of 1/1/2010 was agreed upon. An announcement via email will provide directions on how to access the training. eChalk Expectations: All teachers, counselors, and administrators need to activate their eChalk account so they are listed in the Faculty & Staff directory on the school homepage. As part of the activation process, they need to verify the email settings are configured to forward mail to Outlook. Teachers are also strongly encouraged to establish a class page with a copy of their parent letter/syllabus; this class page can then be used to support technology integration and parental involvement. Schools are also expected to post their school events on the school calendar which will be used to automatically generate a districtwide calendar of school events. Each site has an eChalk site manager to assist staff in achieving these goals. Next Meeting: October 1st, 3:30-4:30, District Registration Center Conference Room
Meeting Details: 3:00-4:15pm at the District Registration Center Conference Room Schools Represented: Bemis, Boyd, Carter, Curtis, Eisenhower, Rialto Middle, Trapp; Also present: Safety & Security, CWA Cyberbullying: - The two online courses available for training teachers on this issue were reviewed. The committee recommends that all teachers and site administrators be required to complete the Keenan Safe Schools course. This course takes approximately 25 minutes to complete and can be completed online anytime, anywhere. Completion can be monitored by administrative reports in the system.
- Noelle Kreider presented a variety of free curriculum materials teachers can use to instruct students in the topic of cyberbullying. NetSmartz is linked on all schools' homepages and provides games and songs for elementary and video vignettes for secondary. CyberSmart provides lesson plans with related worksheets and online resources. Teachers who complete the online iSAFE training can also access this organization's curriculum materials.
- Jerry Sturmer and Floyd Braggs recommended the student AUP include clear language explaining the cyberbullying law to students.
District Technology Plan: The revised plan for 2009-2012 was approved by the state and will be presented for board adoption this month. This plan is required as a condition of various technology funding from the state and federal level. The plan is available on the Educational Technology Committee website. - Technology Scope & Sequence: The most significant task identified in the plan is to integrate a technology scope and sequence into the core content area timelines with key lessons at each grade level. These will help us meet and show evidence of achieving the NCLB goal for students to achieve technology literacy by the end of 8th grade. This will be the primary focus of this committee next year.
- Electronic Gradebook Program: The plan also requires the committee to continue evaluation of gradebook programs next year. eSchool's gradebook feature was evaluated in February; Easy Grade Pro will be evaluated early next school year.
New Helpdesk System: The IT Dept has implemented a new helpdesk system. This system will require users to indicate their computer name when submitting a problem - Noelle showed how to locate this information and recommended teachers label their computers with this information for easy access. Teachers will receive an email when an incident is reported for them and again when it is resolved. They will have 3 days to respond to this notice if they feel the problem was not resolved. Kidspiration 3.0: K-12 Voucher (aka Microsoft settlement) funds were used to upgrade to this new version, which includes math tools. IT Dept is pushing the installation out across the network to all teacher and student computers at elementary schools. Secondary school teachers can request installation as needed (ie: for Special Education). Noelle has provided multiple training sessions and will continue to do so next year. Training videos are also available online. Other:- Student file security was discussed. Secondary students are encouraged to store their electronic files in eChalk to prevent tampering. Each secondary student has 50mb of storage in their eChalk account. Concerns about large media files were discussed and suggestions were offered for compression. Questions or problems regarding the use of eChalk should be directed to Noelle Kreider.
- Noelle reported that IT Dept is currently evaluating a product by NComputing that allows one computer to serve multiple users. This could help address the age of our computers - 56% of student computers are over 4 years old.
This was the last committee meeting of the year.
Meeting Details: 2-4:30pm at the Technology Learning Center, District Education Center Schools Represented: Bemis, Boyd, Casey, Carter, Curtis, Eisenhower, Fitzgerald, Henry, Jehue, Kucera, Trapp eSchool Gradebook Review: One of the goals in the District Educational Technology plan is to evaluate and implement a common gradebook program (either districtwide or across all schools at the same level). To begin this process, the committee conducted a review of the gradebook functionality available in the existing eSchool system. This functionality is currently de-activated, but could be activated if it meets the needs of our district. Committee members and several IT Department employees participated in a phone conference with a Pentamation company representative to preview how the gradebook component of eSchool functions. - Configuration and System Management: An overview was provided on how the gradebook component of eSchool would function "on the back-end." The following items need to be configured at the district or building (school) level on the system prior to implementation.
- Categories: These must be set up at the building level. They can be copied from one building to another. Typically, these include items such as homework, tests, etc. Teachers cannot create categories - they can only select from the list set up at the building level.
- Grading Scales: All grading scales and their "level tables" are set up at the building level. This includes scales such as A-F, 1-4, Pass/Fail, and unique scales used for special needs students.
- Terms: The grading periods must be established at the administrative level as well as the policy for calculating combination of grades for a marking period. For example, if the semester grade will be a 50-50 weight of the quarter 1 and 2 grades, this must be configured. Teachers can be given access to adjust the weighting.
- Alpha Marks: These are set up at the administrative level to allow teachers to enter codes such as EXC for excused in their gradebook. How these codes are treated must also be configured at this level. Examples were excused is not counted toward grade, but missing is counted as a zero.
- Teacher Access Options: From the administrative side of the system, teachers can be allowed/denied access to various options including calculation (round or truncate scores) and grade scale selections, ability to override students' calculated grades.
- Teacher Perspective: A demonstration of the gradebook from the teacher's perspective was provided by the company representative.
- Define Categories: To begin use of the gradebook, the teacher selects the categories of assignments to include in the gradebook. (The categories are defined at the building level, so the teacher cannot add categories.) The teacher can choose to use points-based grading or category weighting. For each category selected, the teacher determines the weight, number of lowest scores to drop, and how missing scores are handled (count as zero or exclude from calculation).
- Grading Scale: For each class, the teacher can choose a grading scale from the scales set up on the administrative side of the system. The teacher can also assign a different grading scale to individual students, such as a modified grading scale for special needs students.
- Entering Assignments: The teacher enters the date assigned (optional), date due, category, extra credit (optional), maximum points, weight within the category. When the Parent Access Center is used, the teacher can also choose to publish the assignment and/or scores and attach related files.
- Entering Scores: The traditional grid display does retain the header at the top and student information on the left as the teacher scrolls down/right. A Default Grade button provides auto-fill functionality and teachers can enter established codes such as EXC for excused.
- Notes: Teachers can use the notes icon to keep general notes about a student (ie: behavior, conferences, etc.). Each note is dated and can be published to the Parent Access Center. Teachers can also add notes to individual assignment scores for a student. It was not clear if these notes will appear on any of the reports or in the parent view.
- Reports: The Student Detail report provides an individual student report of all assignments and their scores by category. The Missing Assignments report also provides individual reports. The Score Threshold report shows which students scored above/below a teacher-defined level on a selected assignment or in their overall class grade - useful for identifying students in need of intervention. All reports are retained in a report list by date for easy retrieval and verification of reporting frequency.
- Term Grades: Teachers can choose to load term grades automatically from the gradebook and can also override individual grades. Grades that combine multiple terms (ie: semester may be a 50-50 combination of quarter 1 and 2 grades) are calculated based on school level settings. It appeared that teachers could not set the gradebook to continue grading across multiple terms - current grade calculations are based on current term only. The committee expressed several concerns about this - many teachers set their gradebook to continue throughout the semester, and the current grade would not be an accurate reflection of the semester grade. (Reports may show a student is doing well in Q2, but when the quarters are combined for the final semester grade, it may actually be lower if the student struggled in Q1.)
- Standards: This gradebook does not currently support the use of standards. The committee discussed the possibility of setting up categories by standard or major concepts instead of by assignment type, but this could be a very cumbersome list since each subject area at each grade level may have a unique list. The company representative indicated some upcoming enhancements may provide standards-related functions - he will investigate and report back on this.
- Elementary teachers expressed concerns about grading by standard because the list of standards they must address across all content areas is very lengthy. Concern was also expressed regarding the elementary report card not reflecting standards-based grading.
Other Gradebook Programs: Brent Copeland at Kucera discussed how he uses the standards-based grading tools of Easy Grade Pro and offered to provide a demonstration at a future meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 4:30pm. The next meeting date will be sent out to committee representatives. Reminders: Committee members should be evaluating the two cyberbullying online courses and submitting their feedback via the discussion board on the committee's eChalk group page.
Time: 3:00pm at the District Registration Center, Conference Room Schools Represented: Carter, Eisenhower, Fitzgerald, Frisbie, Henry, Hughbanks, Myers, Trapp
Cyberbullying: New legislation, AB86, authorizes schools to take disciplinary action against students who have been cyberbullying another student(s). It was discussed that our district may need to revise our AUP and may want to add a note defining cyberbullying and warning students that disciplinary action may be taken, even if the cyberbullying was not done on the school district’s network. To train teachers and administrators in identifying and addressing cyberbullying, Noelle presented two online courses currently available to our district. One is in the Keenan Safe Schools System and the other is in the Professional Development System. Committee members will review these and make a recommendation on their use. Technology Plan: The proposed district technology goals, #1-11, for the revised district Educational Technology Plan were passed out to the members. Each member was asked to take one of the district technology goals and provide feedback and revisions on that goal. The first four goals were presented and suggested revisions were discussed. Since the hour of allocated meeting time was drawing nigh, the rest of the members passed their suggestions/revisions to Noelle Kreider, and Noelle said she will present those later. Electronic Gradebook System The last item discussed by the committee was the need for and lack of a district gradebook program that would meet the needs of teachers and would integrate with the eSchool management system. Matt Kelly discussed the prior recommendation, from the Technology Committee last school year, that we review the gradebook program that is part of eSchool. It was agreed that the committee should use meeting time next month to begin this gradebook review. Matt will make arrangements with the IT Dept for a demonstration and review of the gradebook component of eSchool. Matt said that the Middle School Grading Committee would also be invited to the evaluation meeting. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 4:05 p.m.
Time: 3pm-4pm Location: District Registration Center, Conference Room Schools Represented: Bemis, Boyd, Carter, Curtis, Dollahan, Frisbie, Eisenhower, Hughbanks, Jehue, Kelley, Morris, Myers, Rialto Middle, Simpson
District Technology Plan (Matt Kelly, Noelle Kreider) - Four schools provided the requested input using the online form presented at the last meeting - thank you to Garcia, Frisbie Jehue, RMS for doing your homework!
- Representatives provided input on curriculum component of district technology plan - the attachment below combines this input and responses from the online form.
- Concerns and ideas were shared about the instructional time needed to teach technology, providing opportunities for student access and use, teacher training, parent training, and more.
- A sub committee will review the input and previous goals to create a draft of suggested curriculum goals.
IT Department Update (Beth Ann Scantlebury) - District is currently working on installing a fiber optic network to increase bandwidth. Garcia was recently brought online.
- eRate funds will be used to replace servers as needed.
Elementary Math Online Resources (Matt Kelly) - Handout was provided on how to access online teacher editions.
- Information regarding the online student edition will be provided soon.
|